Unlike with data from GPS devices,
exact geographic positions cannot directly be inferred from
radio-telemetry data. Instead, it is necessary to estimate the
geographic positions of an animal from available information about the
location of the radio-receiving station(s), the antenna bearing, its
spatial probability of detection and the strength of the detected radio
signal. For this purpose, movetrack uses a geometric approach described
in Baldwin et al. (2018). This
is a three-step process that utilises basic principles of antenna
geometry:
- Raw position estimation
- For directional antennas, a coarse raw position is
calculated along the directional beam of the receiving antenna. The
distance to the station is assumed to be half of the theoretical antenna
detection range, which can be specified for each antenna type (Motus
Docs).
- For omnidirectional antennas, the station location
itself is used as the raw position.
- Measurement errors
- For directional antennas, raw positions are
assigned oscillating longitudinal and latitudinal standard deviations,
i.e. measurement errors, that arise from antenna geometry and
orientation. Longitudinal error reaches up to half the theoretical
antenna detection range when the antenna is oriented east or west and is
minimal when oriented north or south; the opposite is true for
latitudinal error.
- For omnidirectional antennas, the theoretical
antenna detection range is used as the longitudinal and latitudinal
measurement errors.
Longitudinal (blue) and latitudinal (orange)
measurement errors, which are used in the observation model part of the
hidden Markov model, vary depending on the antenna orientation up to
half of the theoretical antenna detection range. Note that this figure
illustrates measurement errors specifically for a 6-element Yagi
antenna.
- Aggregation
Finally, the raw positions and measurement errors from all antennas
are aggregated over user-defined time intervals. For each interval,
weighted means—based on signal strength (e.g., measured in dB)—are
calculated for both the raw positions and measurement errors. This data
forms the basis of the observational part in the hidden Markov model
(see vignette("hmm")).
Illustration of how raw positions are estimated
by integrating data from station locations, antenna bearings, and signal
strength (represented by wedge length). Detections from all stations and
antennas are aggregated over fixed time intervals, producing a single
coarse raw position per interval—illustrated here for two consecutive
intervals \(t_1\) and \(t_2\). For simplicity, only the combined
contributions from each station (shown as coloured dots) to the
resulting coarse raw positions (diamonds) are displayed. Each position
is computed as a signal-strength-weighted mean, with point size
indicating the strength of contribution. Estimation accuracy improves
with the number of contributing stations and antennas.
References
Baldwin, J. W., Katie, L., Finn, J. T. & Smetzer, J. R. (2018).
Bayesian state-space models reveal unobserved off-shore nocturnal
migration from Motus data. Ecological Modelling, 386, 38–46.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.08.006